advertisement

State police director supports requiring fingerprints for FOID cards

SPRINGFIELD - The Illinois State Police director said this week that his department has stepped up illegal firearm ownership enforcement methods, but it needs greater resources to continue the job - including fingerprints of Firearm Owner Identification Card applicants.

During a news conference Thursday, Iirector Brendan Kelly gave an update about enforcement efforts and announced support for Senate Bill 1966, a measure that would increase FOID card fees and mandate fingerprinting of applicants.

The House passed the bill in May, but a Senate measure to agree with that final language stalled before a vote. It remains in the Senate assignments committee but could be taken up this legislative session.

Under the bill, sponsored in the House by Rep. Kathleen Willis, an Addison Democrat, new applications for FOID cards and renewals - which would be required every five years - would cost $20, up from the current cost of $10. The fees would fund law enforcement revocation efforts for those not legally allowed to own FOID cards or guns.

Gun advocacy groups such as the Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois and the Illinois State Rifle Association oppose the bill and have argued fingerprinting and increased fees hinder Second Amendment rights.

In a news release Friday, Assistant House Republican Leader C.D. Davidsmeyer, of Jacksonville, called the plan "an overreach" by lawmakers and the state police.

"Director Kelly is pushing legislation that will require all legal gun owners in Illinois to give their fingerprints to the State Police when requesting or renewing their FOID card," Davidsmeyer saide. "This is a continued attack on law-abiding gun owners and it puts undue financial burden on many citizens just trying to protect their families."

While Kelly was questioned about the constitutionality of fingerprinting gun owners at the news conference, he said the main consideration for the state police is public safety - lawmakers and judges will decide constitutionality.

"We will be able to do a much more thorough, effective and quicker background check, even for law-abiding citizens, if we have that fingerprint," he said.

Kelly's briefing came one year after a shooting at an Aurora warehouse left five people dead and others injured. That shooter, Kelly said, should not have had a gun because there was a 1995 felony aggravated battery conviction on his record.

He also said there are several instances similar to this one in which criminal background information is not included in key national databases. There are "over 7 million firearms ownership-prohibiting records in this country which are not readily available in background check databases," he said.

The information does show up when a person is fingerprinted - and it did when the Aurora shooter was fingerprinted for a concealed carry permit in 2014 - but he had already purchased the gun used in the shooting by that time because he lied on his FOID card application, Kelly said.

At the time, police sent a letter to the shooter demanding he turn in his guns but took no other action.

There's progress a year after Pratt exposed gaps in gun seizures, but 'much more to be done'

Article Comments
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the "flag" link in the lower-right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.