Who won the Fields trade? Answer isn’t that simple
“What’s your grade?”
That’s what a friend asked me Saturday night in the aftermath of the Justin Fields trade. The Bears sent Fields to the Pittsburgh Steelers in exchange for a 2025 sixth-round draft pick, which can become a fourth-round pick if Fields plays 51% of the offensive snaps next season.
My initial thoughts ranged through the entire grading system: A-minus, B, C-plus, D. But it was hard to spit out a definitive answer. I wanted to give Ryan Poles a poor grade for executing such a big move on Saturday night during St. Patrick’s Day weekend — one of Chicago’s favorite holidays. Poles, no doubt, is having a stressful offseason and deserves to sit back with a Guinness as much as anybody.
Ultimately, where I landed was this: the grade doesn’t matter. Does. Not. Matter. This move was never about “winning” the trade. This move was going to happen, no matter what the return was.
The minute the Bears landed the No. 1 overall draft pick, gift-wrapped from the woeful two-win Carolina Panthers, this was always the direction things were trending. The Fields truthers can be mad that the Bears gave him away for what they might consider a paltry return, but the fact is the Bears were moving on. They were probably happy to take whatever they could get.
Poles has an opportunity to select USC quarterback Caleb Williams with the No. 1 overall draft pick. Williams is widely considered the best quarterback prospect since at least Trevor Lawrence in 2021. The type of quarterback talent that only emerges once every few years. Yes, it’s a lottery ticket. Highly-touted quarterbacks don’t always work out. But Poles was essentially handed a free lottery ticket and he wasn’t about to throw it away.
Poles didn’t draft Fields and it wouldn’t have mattered if he had. History has shown us that Super Bowl-winning quarterbacks are forced to win games with their arm at some point during a playoff run. In 38 career starts, Fields has totaled 300 passing yards just one time. That’s not the type of quarterback you go all-in on.
The entire NFL saw the writing on the wall. And yet, none of the 31 other teams across the league wanted to make Fields a starter. Anybody who thought the Bears could get a first-round pick in return for Fields was kidding themselves. As soon as starting jobs began filling up, Fields’ value plummeted further.
At the NFL Scouting Combine, Poles said he wanted to “do right” by Fields. Some fans thought that meant sending him to a favorable situation or sending him somewhere he could be a starter right away. But maybe doing right by Justin simply meant not putting him in awkward position by keeping him on the roster when they draft a quarterback. Doing right by Justin was getting him out of Chicago before Williams shows up in two months.
The Bears were never going into the 2024 season with both Fields and Williams on the roster. That’s not doing right by anybody — least of all Fields or Williams.
Could they have gotten more in return if they kept him on the roster and waited to trade him until somebody’s starter got hurt in September or October? Maybe, but there was no guarantee. The Jets had all season to trade for a quarterback after Aaron Rodgers tore his Achilles last year, and they didn’t. The Cardinals traded starting quarterback Josh Dobbs and a seventh-round pick at the trade deadline last year, and all they got in return was a sixth-round pick. You can’t assume a better deal will emerge in the future.
Did the Bears win the Justin Fields trade? It was never about winning the trade. It was about setting up the franchise quarterback — the one they will draft on April 25 — for success.